Popular Nigerian rapper Ice Prince has finally responded to the intense criticism that followed his appearance and performance at the 2026 national convention of the All Progressives Congress, an event that sparked heated reactions across social media and the entertainment industry. The music star came under fire after videos from the convention showed him performing before party supporters at a time many Nigerians continue to express frustration over the country’s economic hardship, insecurity and rising cost of living.
The controversy began after Ice Prince joined fellow artistes at the APC gathering held at Eagle Square in Abuja, where thousands of delegates and party loyalists gathered for the political event. Critics accused the rapper of aligning himself with the ruling party despite widespread public dissatisfaction with the state of the nation. Social media users particularly questioned why entertainers who often speak about the struggles facing ordinary Nigerians would participate in political events linked to the government.
Responding to the backlash during a recent podcast interview, Ice Prince explained that his decision to perform at the event was not politically motivated but deeply personal. According to the rapper, the invitation came from his uncle, Nentawe Yilwatda, who currently serves as the chairman of the APC. He stressed that the appearance was done out of family loyalty and respect rather than political endorsement. ..READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE .
The rapper stated that many people misunderstood his intentions and quickly concluded that he was openly supporting the government. He maintained that entertainers are often invited to perform at different events and should not always be judged politically because of their appearances. His explanation, however, has continued to divide public opinion online, with some Nigerians defending his right to perform wherever he chooses while others insist that celebrities must be more conscious of the political messages attached to their actions.
The debate surrounding Ice Prince’s performance also revived discussions about the role of Nigerian entertainers in politics and governance. Over the years, celebrities have increasingly come under pressure from fans who expect them to use their influence to demand accountability from political leaders rather than entertain them at party functions. Some critics argued that performances at political events can be interpreted as indirect support for the administration, especially during periods of national hardship.
The backlash against Ice Prince intensified further because it came shortly after the rapper reacted emotionally to deadly attacks in Jos, Plateau State, where he lamented years of violence and insecurity affecting his people. Some social media users accused him of contradiction, arguing that he could not publicly sympathise with victims of insecurity while also performing at a convention organised by the ruling party.
Despite the criticism, several supporters defended the rapper, insisting that musicians are professionals whose performances should not automatically be interpreted as political allegiance. Others argued that the entertainment industry has historically maintained relationships with politicians across different administrations and political parties in Nigeria.
The incident has once again highlighted the growing scrutiny public figures face in Nigeria, particularly in an era where social media reactions can quickly turn performances, appearances and personal choices into nationwide political debates.
