The long-running dispute within the Okoye family has taken another dramatic turn after former P-Square manager, Jude Okoye, publicly responded to allegations made by his younger brother, Peter Okoye, over the alleged diversion of the legendary music group’s royalties.
In a fresh reaction to the ongoing legal battle, Jude dismissed Peter’s claims that he secretly diverted P-Square’s earnings through Northside Music Limited. Determined to defend his reputation, he released what he described as documentary evidence to counter the accusations, insisting that the financial transactions in question were legitimate and transparent.
According to Jude, the documents show that the royalty payments and business arrangements being questioned were properly handled and do not support the narrative that he unlawfully redirected funds. He argued that the evidence speaks for itself and urged the public to allow the legal process to determine the facts rather than relying on speculation...READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE .
The latest development comes after Peter had accused his elder brother of secretly incorporating Northside Music Limited, a company he alleged was used to receive royalties belonging to P-Square without his knowledge. Peter also claimed that he was denied access to important financial records and backend data relating to the group’s music catalogue, allegations that have formed a major part of the court proceedings. (Punch Newspapers)
Jude’s response has further intensified the highly publicized family feud, with many fans closely following every new revelation. The dispute, which has stretched beyond their music careers into the courtroom, continues to generate widespread reactions across social media, as supporters remain divided over who is telling the full story.
While both brothers maintain opposing positions, the controversy has once again highlighted the deep cracks that remain within one of Africa’s most successful music families. With fresh evidence now being presented and legal proceedings still ongoing, many observers believe the final outcome will ultimately depend on the court’s assessment of the facts rather than public opinion.
